Politics, law and (mythical) authority
Legal philosophy
course,
Department of Philosophy, EUR
1st semester, 2003-2004
Gijs van Oenen
1. Introduction
2. William Scheuerman, Between the norm
and the exception. MIT 1994.
Ch. 1: A totalitarian concept of the
political,
p. 13-38
And:
Beatrice Hanssen, Critique of violence. Routledge 2000. Introduction
and ch 1: On the
politics
of pure means: Benjamin, Arendt, Foucault, p. 1-29
3. Carl Schmitt, Der Begriff des Politischen. Duncker & Humblot 1932, p. 20-78 (English translation: “The concept of the political”)
4. H.L.A. Hart, The concept of law.
Clarendon
press 1961
Ch 7: Formalism and rule-scepticism,
124-154
5. Peter Fitzpatrick, Modernism and the
grounds of law. Cambridge up 2001.
Ch 1: Origin, 11-36
6. id., ch 2: Position, 37-69 [Freud, Zizek, Foucault]
7. id, ch 3: Law, 70-107 [Derrida, Hart]
8. Jacques Derrida, Negotiations.
Interventions
and interviews, 1971-2001. Stanford up 2002: 'Declarations of
Independence',
46-54
and 'What I would have said', 55-68
9. id, The deconstruction of actuality, 85-116
10. Jacques Derrida, Force of law. In: Drucilla Cornell a.o. (eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice. Routledge 1992, 3-67
11. Jacques Balkin, ‘Deconstructive practice and legal theory’. Yale Law Review, 1987, pp 1-48
12+13. Hent de Vries, Religion and violence. Johns Hopkins 2002. 'Anti-Babel. The theologico-political at cross-purposes', 211-292
14. Yannis Stavrakakis, Lacan & the political. Routledge 1999. ch 3: Encircling the political, 71-98. And ch. 5: Ambiguous democracy and the ethics of psychoanalysis, 122-140
15. Slavoj Zizek, Why does the
law need an obscene supplement? In:
Peter Goodrich, David Carlson (eds.), Law and the postmodern mind,
Michigan up
1998, pp 75-98
U kunt ook (terug) naar:
Last change: September 3, 2003