This page presents the filler-data for

[94.8] Wakker, Peter P., Ido Erev, & Elke Weber (1994), “Comonotonic Independence: The Critical Test between Classical and Rank-Dependent Utility Theories,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9, 195-230.

These data were not used in the analysis.

1. The Stimuli

There are eight filler gamble pairs. Subjects chose between each gamble pair. Hereafter, (p1, $x1; p2, $x2; p3, $x3) denotes a gamble yielding $x1 with prob. p1, $x2 with prob. p2, and $x3 with prob. p3. The safer of the two choice options is always presented first, and in gambles the “common outcome” is always presented first.


       
                
1st pair: (.50, $2.0;  .10, $2.0;  .40, $2.0) (safe) versus
          (.50, $2.0;  .10, $0.0;  .40, $3.0) (risky) 

2nd pair: (.50, $1.5;  .10, $2.5;  .40, $2.5) (safe) versus
          (.50, $0.0;  .10, $0.0;  .40, $3.0) (risky)   

3d  pair: (.60, $0.0;  .20, $0.0;  .20, $2.0) (safe) versus
          (.60, $0.0;  .20, $1.0;  .20, $5.0) (risky) 

4th pair: (.35, $0.5;  .40, $1.0;  .25, $0.5) (safe) versus
          (.35, $0.5;  .40, $1.5;  .25, $3.0) (risky) 

5th pair: (.20, $0.5;  .20, $0.5;  .60, $0.5) (safe) versus
          (.20, $0.5;  .20, $0.0;  .60, $2.0) (risky) 

6th pair: (.10, $1.0;  .80, $2.0;  .10, $1.0) (safe) versus
          (.10, $1.0;  .80, $0.0;  .10, $4.0) (risky) 

7th pair: (.00, $0.0;  .20, $1.5;  .80, $1.5) (safe) versus
          (.00, $0.0;  .20, $0.0;  .80, $2.0) (risky) 

8th pair: (.75, $0.0;  .05, $1.5;  .20, $1.5) (safe) versus
          (.75, $0.0;  .05, $0.0;  .20, $2.0) (risky)

The stimuli were presented in exactly the same manner as those used in the analysis, i.e., under four conditions:

Condition collapsed (C, 22 subjects)
Condition not collapsed (N, 21 subjects)
Condition verbal (V, 20 subjects)
Condition graphical (G, 21 subjects)

2. The Data

The following four matrices (one for each condition) give the individual data. The subjects had to make each choice twice. For each gamble pair we counted the number of risky choices. Thus we have the following scores:

2: The subject consistently chose risky, i.e., chose the risky gamble both times.
1: The subject was inconsistent, i.e, chose risky once and safe once.
0: The subject consistently chose safe, i.e., chose the safe gamble both times.

In the matrices, each row gives the scores of a subject. Column 1 gives subject nr, the other eight colums belong to the gamble pairs.


 ------------------Condition Collapsed (C)-----------------

 pair:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

 c01     2  0  2  2  1  0  1  0
 c02     0  0  1  2  1  1  0  2
 c03     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  0
 c04     2  0  2  2  2  0  1  2
 c05     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 c06     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  0
 c07     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 c08     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  2
 c09     0  0  2  2  2  0  1  2
 c10     2  0  2  2  2  0  0  2
 c11     2  0  2  2  2  0  1  1
 c12     0  0  2  1  0  0  0  1
 c13     2  0  2  2  1  1  1  2
 c14     2  0  2  2  2  1  0  1
 c15     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  1
 c16     0  0  2  2  0  1  0  0
 c17     2  0  2  2  2  0  1  0
 c18     0  1  2  2  2  0  0  2
 c19     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  0
 c20     2  0  2  2  2  0  0  2
 c21     2  0  2  2  2  0  1  0
 c22     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  0



 ----------------Condition Not collapsed (N)---------------

 pair:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

 n01     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  2
 n02     0  0  2  2  2  0  1  1
 n03     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  1
 n04     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  1
 n05     0  0  2  2  1  0  1  0
 n06     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  1
 n07     1  0  2  2  1  0  0  0
 n08     0  0  1  2  0  1  0  1
 n09     2  1  2  1  2  0  1  0
 n10     0  0  2  2  2  2  0  2
 n11     1  0  2  2  2  0  1  2
 n12     2  0  2  2  2  0  1  2
 n13     0  0  2  2  0  0  1  1
 n14     2  0  2  1  2  0  0  1
 n15     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  2
 n16     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  1
 n17     2  0  2  2  2  0  2  2
 n18     1  1  2  2  1  0  0  0
 n19     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  1
 n20     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 n21     0  0  2  1  2  1  0  0



 -------------------Condition Verbal (V)-------------------

 pair:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

 v01     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  0
 v02     1  0  2  2  2  2  0  2
 v03     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  2
 v04     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  2
 v05     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  2
 v06     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 v07     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  1
 v08     1  0  2  2  1  1  0  1
 v09     0  1  1  2  1  1  0  2
 v10     2  0  2  2  1  0  0  2
 v11     0  0  2  2  2  2  0  1
 v12     0  0  2  2  2  1  1  2
 v13     2  0  2  2  1  0  0  0
 v14     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  2
 v15     1  0  2  2  1  1  1  2
 v16     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 v17     1  0  2  2  1  0  1  1
 v18     1  0  2  2  1  0  2  1
 v19     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  0
 v20     2  0  2  2  2  0  2  2
        


 ------------------Condition Graphical (G)-----------------

 pair:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

 g01     0  0  2  2  2  0  0  1
 g02     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 g03     1  0  2  2  2  0  2  2
 g04     0  1  2  2  2  1  0  0
 g05     2  0  2  2  2  0  2  2
 g06     0  1  2  2  0  0  1  1
 g07     1  0  2  2  2  0  0  2
 g08     2  0  2  2  2  0  0  1
 g09     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  2
 g10     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  1
 g11     2  0  2  2  2  0  0  1
 g12     2  0  2  2  2  0  2  0
 g13     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 g14     0  0  2  2  1  0  0  2
 g15     1  0  2  2  2  0  0  1
 g16     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  1
 g17     1  0  2  2  2  1  1  2
 g18     1  0  1  0  1  2  2  1
 g19     0  0  2  2  2  0  1  2
 g20     0  0  2  2  0  0  0  0
 g21     1  0  2  2  2  0  0  0